Once filed, the requester cannot “unfile” the reexamination. Many pitfalls await the unwary. Learn More

How to institute a reexamination, common pitfalls, ex parte versus inter partes. Learn More

Most recent USPTO reexamination statistics regarding volume and timing from 2007-2009. Learn More

Concise definitions and discussions of important reexamination concepts and terminology. Learn More

View All Essentials

Hot Topics

Reexamination Pendency

Reexamination pendency is an important factor weighed by the courts when deciding whether to stay concurrent litigation.

Learn More

Executive Interviews

The Reexamination Center Executive Interview: Richard Levick on “Reexaminations and the Media”

Reexaminations can have huge collateral impact on patent owners, alleged infringers, and other stakeholders and interested parties. It thus behooves all involved to be aware of the public impact of reexaminations and how best to manage and react to public scrutiny. We are most pleased to be able to address this topic in this interview with Richard Levick, Founder and CEO of Levick Strategic Communications (www.levick.com).

Learn More

Quick Stat

2,033

Total number of requests for reexamination currently pending as of December 31, 2009.

Learn More

Reexamination News & Events

Subscribe

View All News & Events

Mar 9, 2010

AIPLA Webinar on Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexamination: Strategies and Tactics

An important webinar on the fundamentals of US reexamination practice and procedure before the USPTO, sponsored by the American Intellectual Property Law Association was held on on Wednesday, March 3, 2010. David J. Cushing and David Emery of Sughrue Mion, PLLC, of Washington, DC were the presenters. The seminar lasted for 90 minutes and was accompanied by a useful Powerpoint presentation and article.

Learn More

Mar 9, 2010

New Requests for Inter Partes Reexamination in Official Gazette of March 9, 2010

This week the Official Gazette noticed eight inter partes reexamination requests. Apple Inc. filed two requests against EMG Technology’s patents on an apparatus and method of manipulating a region on a wireless device screen for viewing, zooming and scrolling internet content and navigating internet content on a television using a simplified interface and a remote control. Costa Farms filed a request against Hubie Grown’s patent on a self-supporting live goods cage. Micron Technology filed a request against Panavision Imaging’s patent on pre-charging a wide analog bus for CMOS image sensors. StaMix filed a request against Sulzer Chemtech’s patent on stacked static mixing elements. Telecommunications Systems filed a request against Sybase’s patent on a short message gateway, system and method of providing information service for mobile telephones. Vendio Services filed a request against Mark A Wolfe’s patent on a system and method for communicating information relating to a network resource.

Learn More

Mar 9, 2010

New Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination in Official Gazette of March 9, 2010

This week the Official Gazette noticed fourteen ex parte reexamination requests. Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a request against C2 Communications Technologies’ patent on a method and apparatus for implementing a computer network/internet telephone system. Lifeclinic International filed a request against Computerized Screening’s patent on a health care information system. Magna International filed a request against Dura Global Technologies’ patent on a power sliding rear window. The Ohio Willow Wood Co. filed a request against Applied Elastomerics’ patent on tear resistant gels, composites, and liner articles. Anonymous third parties filed requests against patents assigned to Southwire Company, PB&J Software, AU Optronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics, Tri-Star Electronics, Clinical Decision Support, Accent Signage Systems, and LAM Research Corporation.

Learn More