Latest News

All News

Executive Interviews

The Reexamination Center Executive Interview: Richard Levick on “Reexaminations and the Media”

Reexaminations can have huge collateral impact on patent owners, alleged infringers, and other stakeholders and interested parties. It thus behooves all involved to be aware of the public impact of reexaminations and how best to manage and react to public scrutiny. We are most pleased to be able to address this topic in this interview with Richard Levick, Founder and CEO of Levick Strategic Communications (www.levick.com).

Learn More

Quick Stat

2,041

Total number of requests for reexamination currently pending as of June 30, 2010.

Learn More

Resources

Law & Legislation

Print

In re Swanson, 540 F.3d. 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

In re Portola Packaging, Inc., 110 F.3d 786 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Download PDF)

In re Recreative Technologies, 83 F.3d 1394, 1397 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (Download PDF)

KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR), US Supreme Court (2007) (Download PDF)

H.R. Rep. No. 107-120, at 2. Substantial New Question of Patentability (Download PDF)

Sundance, Inc. v. Demonte Fabricating LTD. (Fed. Cir. Dec. 24, 2008) (Download PDF)

Senate Bill S515 Post Grant Review (“PGR”) (Download PDF)

In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (Download PDF)

Egyptian Goddess Inc. v. Swisa Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Circ. 2010) (Download PDF)

International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. (Fed. Circ. 2009) (Download PDF)