News

SKGF Publishes First In-Depth Analysis of Patent Reexamination Appeals

January 20th, 2010

Washington, DC-based intellectual property specialty law firm Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. (SKGF) has published the first paper to provide an in-depth analysis of all aspects of patent reexamination appeals, including appeals from the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI), as well as from the BPAI to the Court of Appeals to the Federal Circuit (CAFC).  Appeals from the Central Reexamination Unit provides the first detailed analysis on what is happening to patents in reexamination being appealed at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO).  The statistics and analysis provided is based on a comprehensive review of all 188 publicly available final decisions rendered by the BPAI from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2010.  Examples of data collected include various appeal statistics such as time between a Right of Appeal Notice docketing at the Board, and between docketing and a Board Decision on the merits for both inter partes and ex parte reexamination.  It also includes statistics on affirmance and reversal rates by art unit.

This paper will be part of the course materials for the upcoming 5th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute on January 21-22, 2010 hosted at the USPTO.

“We are pleased to provide cutting edge data and analysis on this important developing area of patent reexamination,” said Robert Greene Sterne, founding director of SKGF, paper co-author, and recognized expert on patent reexaminations.  “Previously unavailable, this data and our analysis confirms what we have known anecdotally: the next big battle ground in reexamination is going to be appeals from the CRU.”

Jon E. Wright, SKGF director, paper co-author and former CAFC clerk observed, “The CAFC is going to be confronting a flood of reexam appeals from the CRU.  The Court is going to have to decide critical issues involving reexams to make the system more timely, balanced and effective.”

Lori A. Gordon, SKGF director, paper co-author, and seasoned reexamination attorney with domain experience in electronics and communications noted, “Our data collection and analysis provides the first ever explanation of what is really happening at the CRU in terms of appeals to the BPAI.  The BPAI is experiencing very significant backlogs in appeals from normal patent examination.  The addition of a significant number of time-critical appeals from the CRU will further test the BPAI’s ability to process reexam appeals with the required ’special dispatch.’”

Paper co-author and SKGF associate Byron L. Pickard added that “Other areas of interest are district court review of reexam rulings under the Administrative Procedure Act and possible mandamus actions.  These areas of reexam law may prove critical as the reexam process matures.”

Download the full paper here: Appeals from the Central Reexamination Unit